Saudi offer to build 200 mosques in Germany

for Syrian migrants is slammed as ‘cynical’ because the Kingdom has not offered to take any refugees themselves

  • Saudi Arabian King Salman will fund construction programme in Germany
  • Politicians say the offer is ‘cynical’ because of the nation’s foreign policy
  • They argue that Saudi Arabia should help by taking in some migrants
  • Also say that they are creating refugees with military campaign in Yemen 

Conservative politicians in Germany have attacked an offer from Saudi Arabia to build 200 mosques in the country for the ‘spiritual needs’ of the Syrian refugees arriving daily in their thousands.

Andrea Scheuer, general secretary of the CSU party in Bavaria which is Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ally in the state, called the offer ‘cynical’ given that the Kingdom is making thousands of refugees of its own in its military campaign in Yemen.

‘No, it is more than cynical. This is no Muslim Brotherhood. Where is the solidarity in the Arab world?’ he asked, given that the Kingdom has not offered to take in refugees fleeing from the civil war in Syria.

Andrea Scheuer, general secretary of the CSU party in Bavaria which is Chancellor Angela Merkel's ally in the state, called the offer 'cynical' given that the Kingdom is making thousands of refugees of its own in its military campaign in Yemen

Andrea Scheuer, general secretary of the CSU party in Bavaria which is Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ally in the state, called the offer ‘cynical’ given that the Kingdom is making thousands of refugees of its own in its military campaign in Yemen

Stephan Mayer, domestic policy spokesman of both the CSU and Merkel's CDU in parliament in Berlin, agreed with him, saying Germany needs solidarity with the refugee crisis, not a cash donation for 200 mosques

Stephan Mayer, domestic policy spokesman of both the CSU and Merkel’s CDU in parliament in Berlin, agreed with him, saying Germany needs solidarity with the refugee crisis, not a cash donation for 200 mosques

The offer comes as tens of thousands of migrants head to the Hungarian border, many of them on their way to Germany, which is expecting 800,000 migrants this year alone

The offer comes as tens of thousands of migrants head to the Hungarian border, many of them on their way to Germany, which is expecting 800,000 migrants this year alone

Thousands of migrants continue to gather at Hungary border

Stephan Mayer, the domestic policy spokesman of both the CSU and Merkel’s CDU in parliament in Berlin, agreed with him, adding: ‘Germany does not need a cash donation to build 200 mosques but solidarity with the refugees.’

The offer comes as tens of thousands of migrants head to the Hungarian border, many of them on their way to Germany, which is expecting 800,000 migrants this year alone

Many newspapers expressed outrage that Germany would ever consider such an offer from a country which practiced an extreme form of Islam which includes punishments such as stoning, flogging and limb mutiliation.

The offer was apparently made through diplomatic channels and surfaced in Lebanese newspaper al diyar towards the end of last week.

According to the report, the mosque construction programme was the idea of the absolutist Saudi monarch King Salman. He is content to give the asylum seekers a wide berth in his own land, fearful as he, and the other arch conservatives who assist him, of them importing a form of political dissent that they believe would threaten the auotcracy.

CDU Deputy Chairman Armin Laschet said: ‘Instead of talking about funding mosques, Saudi Arabia should be thinking about taking refugees and ending financing of ISIS.’

CDU Deputy Chairman Armin, left, Laschet said: 'Instead of talking about funding mosques, Saudi Arabia should be thinking about taking refugees and ending financing of ISIS'

CDU Deputy Chairman Armin, left, Laschet said: ‘Instead of talking about funding mosques, Saudi Arabia should be thinking about taking refugees and ending financing of ISIS’

Advertisements

French Muslim association proposes tax on halal food to fund mosques and fight radicalisation

The levy would fund a foundation for French mosques to reduce foreign funding

An influential group representing French Muslims is proposing a tax on halal food to fund mosques and fight radicalisation in the wake of a seires of terror attacks.

Anouar Kbibech, president of the French Council of the Muslim Faith (CFCM), outlined plans for a new foundation that would help reduce foreign benefactors amid concerns over extremism.

The idea has been supported by politicians on both the right and left, although there are doubts where such a tax could be implemented.

“The idea has existed since the CFCM was founded,” Mr Kbibech told French broadcaster BFMTV.

“We have reached the first step with the signing with of a religious framework in the CFCM’s halal charter, which defines the criteria of halal in France.

“In autumn we will discuss the second part, which is the financial contribution of halal organisations to worship.”

The money raised would go towards paying imams’ salaries and funding the construction and operation of mosques, which cannot receive state support under French law.

The proposal came after Manuel Valls, the French Prime Minister,called for a ban on foreign funding for Muslim places of worship amid concerns over extremism following a string of terror attacks.

“There needs to be a thorough review to form a new relationship with French Islam,” he said.

“We live in a changed era and we must change our behaviour. This is a revolution in our security culture…the fight against radicalisation will be the task of a generation.”

Nathalie Goulet, a French senator for Orne who conducted a report on the issue, said the creation of a central and transparent foundation was a priority but cast doubt on a halal tax.

“Legally, it is not possible to reduce a tax on a religious item,” she told Le Monde.

“And technically, a ‘halal tax’ would be impossible to implement because there is no unity around the concept of halal.

“What would be possible is that representatives of the religion themselves introduce a private fee for service at the time of slaughter, to be set by the community, collected and sent to the foundation.”

There has been continued controversy over the sale of halal food in France, with a supermarket in Colombes ordered to sell pork and alcohol or face closure this week.

Source

Govt approved charity’s hate speech: 5 approved methods for executing gay men as per the hadith

Muslim Imam “a role model for young Muslims” explains the 5 approved methods for executing gay men.

Sydney’s Imam Husain Islamic Centre advises ‘best way is to chop gay men’s heads off’.

Sheik Sodegar’s prescription for dealing with Sydney’s gay man epidemic is proudly published in Australia right now!

It must be good advice because it’s published by a Federal Government registered deductible gift recipient.

Yes how to kill gay men is brought to you by a charity organisation – exempt of any taxes courtesy of the Australian Government of Fools – the Imam Husain Islamic Centre.

The good sheik’s lectures can be conveniently located on the moderate Australian Immam Hussein Islamic Centre. http://www.ihic.org.au/Multi-Media/Video/Albums/Muharram-2015

Source

Muslim Prayers Block Streets

Is this really about prayer?

Islamic men block the streets of major cities in the world as a show of dominance and defiance.

This is the beginning of flexing their muscle against the ruling police, against the law of the land.

It is the beginning of No Go Zones where police, ambulance, firefighters, media and non muslims are not welcome.  Could you imagine living in this street?

Sydney – July 2014 Thousands of Muslims men pray together in the streets of Lakemba in Sydney’s south-west blocking access to traffic.

Islam Muslim prayer block streets

 

Los Angeles Oct 2015

 USA

20130205_muslims_pray_capitol_Washington

Paris

Muslims praying in the streets paris

 

Rome

muslim-prayers-rome

 

 

 

Sharia – Alive and well in Australia

Sharia law in operation

IN PLACES where the long arm of the law struggles to reach, a second arm gathers strength and tightens its grip on willing and unwilling victims, mostly women.

In some Australian suburbs it is no longer a case of one law for all as Sharia-style dispensation of justice is quietly executed in Australian mosques on a daily basis.

An Australian imam has openly said he is doing just that in Sydney mosques every day.

Sheikh Haisam Farache, who is being trained by Legal Aid as a culturally and linguistic diverse mediator, said this role “formally recognises what he’s been doing for years” – applying Sharia to arbitrate family disputes and avoid(ing) a long and painful journey through the court system. 1

Sheikh Farache said he had been applying Sharia during stints as an imam at Artarmon and Lakemba mosques, where he typically facilitated “two or three mediations a day”.

He believes “Sharia has been playing out in the Australian Family Court” since mediation was introduced into the Family Court system in 2005.

Though it is flagged as a mediation process to resolve family disputes, there is a very real concern that we may have a repeat of the situation which Britain faces, and is now trying to rectify.

The poor treatment of Muslim women in that country is so extensive that a Member of the House of Lords, Baroness Caroline Cox, has introduced a bill to strengthen the law’s ability to regulate sharia courts and force them to comply with anti-discrimination law.

Baroness Cox has said: “We cannot sit here complacently in our red and green benches while women are suffering a system which is utterly incompatible with the legal principles upon which this country is founded.”2

Could we be doing the same thing in Australia by assuming that Sharia law will not and is not operating in this country?

It seems clear that forms of Sharia mediation or arbitration are already at play in this country, and though no-one would question the need for cultural and linguistic assistance for those facing a court process, it seems likely that Muslim women in Australia will be facing the same forms of manipulative gender-biased discrimination which are enshrined in many variations of Islamic marriage laws.

In Britain, Sharia councils are legally able to deal with some areas of arbitration, but they are dispensing their sharia version of “justice” far beyond what is legitimate.

Those who suffer the consequences are invariably Muslim women and children.

Baroness Cox authored a 41-page report entitled A Parallel World: Confronting the abuse of many Muslim women in Britain Today. 3

In her introduction she states: “I have sat and wept with those who are oppressed, abused and treated as second class citizens. One Muslim woman told me: “I feel betrayed by Britain. I came here to get away from this and the situation is worse here than in the country I escaped from”.”

The report outlines numerous examples of women who must battle a form of justice most in the Western World would find extremely abhorrent.

In one example, a woman who was raped and abused over many years by the cousin she was forced to marry at the age of 16, faced intimidation and refusals when she sought a Sharia council divorce. Her UK Court protection orders were regarded as irrelevant, and though she was in fear of her life she was told to attend mediation.

Another woman had a husband who physically abused her during pregnancy and afterwards. When she sought a divorce, she was told by the Imam that, even though her husband was extremely violent, she could not get a divorce without his permission.

There are many cases of women living in polygamous marriages, because Islamic laws allow a man to have four wives but a woman may only have one husband.

The examples of abuse by husbands, followed by discrimination and intimidation from imams, go on and on.

This is not an attack on religious freedom of expression. This is about Muslim women who are Australian citizens being able to enjoy complete freedom and access to the law.

It is also about confronting an issue which is in danger of being ignored due to its sensitivity.

If the legal arm wrestle is left to play out uncontested, will the long arm of Australian law prevail or will the misogynistic arm of Sharia hold back and repress the Muslim women of Australia?

refer: http://www.georgechristensen.com.au/sharia-law-in-operation/

refer:http://www.thepointmagazine.com.au/post.php?s=2015-02-05-sharia-and-the-australian-family-court


Sharia law applied secretly in Sydney

Approval for wife beating

I want a politicain who sees the absurdity in:
On one hand says we must stamp out domestic violence and then allows more Mosques and more opportunity for Mullahs to teach that Allah approves and encourages Islam men to beat their wifes …and even instruct on how they are to be beaten

 

 

Muslim Clerics on the Religious Rulings Regarding Wife-Beating

By: Steven Stalinsky & Y. Yehoshua*
Introduction

On January 14, 2004, Sheikh Muhammad Kamal Mustafa, the imam of the mosque of the city of Fuengirola, Costa del Sol, was sentenced by a Barcelona court to a 15 month suspended sentence and fined 2160 for publishing his book ‘The Woman in Islam.’ In this book, the Egyptian-born Sheikh Mustafa writes, among other things, on wife-beating in accordance with Shar’ia law.

On pages 86-87, Mustafa states: “The [wife-]beating must never be in exaggerated, blind anger, in order to avoid serious harm [to the woman].” He adds, “It is forbidden to beat her on the sensitive parts of her body, such as the face, breast, abdomen, and head. Instead, she should be beaten on the arms and legs,” using a “rod that must not be stiff, but slim and lightweight so that no wounds, scars, or bruises are caused.” Similarly, “[the blows] must not be hard.” [1]

Mustafa noted in his book that the aim of the beating was to cause the woman to feel some emotional pain, without humiliating her or harming her physically. According to him, wife-beating must be the last resort to which the husband turns in punishing his wife, and is, according to the Qur’an, Chapter 4, Verse 34, the husband’s third step when the wife is rebellious: First, he must reprimand her, without anger. Next, he must distance her from the conjugal bed. Only if these two methods fail should the husband turn to beating.

In his verdict, the judge said that Sheikh Mustafa’s book contained incitement to violence against women, that today’s society is completely different from society 1400 years ago, and that the sections of the book in which the sheikh wrote of wife-beating constitute a violation of the penal code and of women’s constitutional rights. In his defense, Sheikh Mustafa’s attorney argued that his client was not expressing his personal opinion, but only reiterating the writings of Islam from the 13th and 19th centuries. [2]

read more

What is a Mosque

Is a Mosque simple a place of worship and therefore should be regarded the same as a church, a Synagogue, an Ashram or temple.

 

First, Mr. President, a mosque is not simply the Muslim version of a church, synagogue or temple. Because of the example of Muhammad, who is called the perfect man in the Qur’an (believed by Muslims to be the exact words of Allah), we know that mosques are established not only as places of prayer and worship, but also as centers for indoctrination, the dispensing of shariah justice, the stockpiling of weapons, and the launching of jihad. If in doubt about any of this, please check with the French police, who recently have been conducting raids on mosques and Islamic Centers in the wake of horrific jihadist attacks in Paris.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/02/05/presidents-speech-at-islamic-center-of-baltimore-a-fact-check/

Netherlands

Published on 3 Dec 2014

Speech in parliament

Machiel de Graaf :
PVV WE MUST CLOSE ALL MOSQUES

the Netherlands must be de-Islamised, all mosques must be closed, Jihadists must be expelled from the country and never allowed back, the borders must be closed to people from Islamic countries, the government must commit itself to voluntary migration to Muslim countries, criminals with a double passport must be expelled, and only if these measures are implemented will the Netherlands see a positive change.

How to stop mosques

Moslum population growth:

What is a mosque:

What is the difference between between Mosques and the church as we know them

7.40

What happens inside a mosque.

David Yerushalmi 100 mosques divided into 19% non violent, moderatly muslim and 51% severely violent.mosques.

75% Attendanced severely violent mosque.

  • Kill the gays
  • Oppress the Jews
  • Reject the infedel and their laws
  • Suppression of women
  • give money to the terrorist organisations

Suadi publications on Hate

A mosque used to promote Islamic Doctrine

Koran